Thursday, December 28, 2017

STUDY: MAIN MEDIA COVERAGE JUST 5% POSITIVE FOR TRUMP, Explains why Corrupt Media is Corrupt

I've been calling the mainstream media corrupt for more than eight years. 
This study proves my point.
Washington Examiner reports the media’s coverage of President Trump has been overwhelmingly negative, more than three times more critical than the initial coverage of former President Barack Obama and twice that of former Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton.

The Pew Research Center said that the early coverage of Trump was 62 percent negative. By comparison, Obama’s coverage was just 20 percent negative.

“About six-in-ten stories on Trump’s early days in office had a negative assessment, about three times more than in early coverage for Obama and roughly twice that of Bush and Clinton. Coverage of Trump’s early time in office moved further away from a focus on the policy agenda and more toward

More here

1 comment:

  1. At this point, I almost hope the media DOESN'T straighten up, they're doing so well at digging their own graves.